Processing math: 0%

Pages

Some problems on prime numbers


In previous posts, we have learned about prime numbers, and we know from Euclid's Theorem that there exists an infinite number of primes. In this post, we continue to look at prime numbers. Leading mathematicians like Fermat, Euler, Gauss were all fascinated by prime numbers. There are many problems about primes that even the statements are simple, but they still remain unsolved even to this day.




Goldbach's conjecture


This is probably the most famous problem on prime numbers. The Goldbach's conjecture predicts that any even number greater than 2 can be written as a sum of two prime numbers. For example,

  • 4 = 2 + 2
  • 6 = 3 + 3
  • 8 = 3 + 5
  • 10 = 3 + 7 = 5 + 5
  • 12 = 5 + 7
  • 14 = 3 + 11 = 7 + 7
  • ...


The mathematician Goldbach stated this conjecture in a letter that he sent to the mathematician Euler in 1742. With current technology, mathematicians have used powerful computers to verify the conjecture and proved it correct up to numbers of billion billion's multitude. However, no one has ever been able to come up with a general proof for every even number. Some prizes of up to million dollars have occasionally been offered to a solution of this conjecture, but so far there have been no lucky winners.

Open problem. 
Prove or disprove that any even number greater than 2 can be written as a sum of two prime numbers.



Chebyshev's Theorem 



Chebyshev's theorem is a very beautiful theorem asserting that for any number n > 1, there is always a prime number lying between n and 2n. For instance,

  • between 2 and 4, there is a prime number 3
  • between 3 and 6, there is a prime number 5; and 
  • between 4 and 8, there are prime numbers 5 and 7, etc.


Chebyshev's Theorem. For any n > 1, there always exists a prime number p such that n < p < 2n.


This result was first conjectured by Bertrand in 1845 and it was proved later by Chebyshev in 1850. The theorem is also widely known as Bertrand's postulate. This theorem has an elementary proof due to the famous mathematician Erdos. When he was 19 year old, Erdos came up with a simple elementary proof of the theorem. We will look at this proof in our future posts.


Chebyshev's theorem gives us the following corollary. Suppose that p_i denotes the ith prime number.  Then by Chebyshev's theorem, there is a prime number p such that p_i < p < 2 p_i. It means that p_i < p_{i+1} < 2p_i, and we have the following


Theorem. If p_i and p_{i+1} are two consecutive prime numbers then \frac{p_{i+1}}{p_i}  <  2.



We have observed that for any pair of consecutive primes (p_i, p_{i+1}) the fraction \frac{p_{i+1}}{p_i} is bounded above by 2. A similar question is raised as whether or not the difference p_{i+1} - p_i is also bounded above. In other words, is there a constant c such that for any pair of consecutive primes (p_i, p_{i+1}) it will hold that p_{i+1} - p_i < c? The answer to this question is negative.

We will show that p_{i+1} - p_i can be as large as any number. To prove this, first, let us introduce a notation n!, it reads "n factorial", its formula is as follows n! = 1 \times 2 \times 3 \times 4 \times \dots \times n.

Clearly, the number 100! + 2 is divisible by 2, the number 100! + 3 is divisible by 3, the number 100! + 4 is divisible by 4, ... So the numbers from 100! + 2 to 100! + 100 are all composite numbers. Thus, if p_i is the prime number standing right before 100! + 2, then the next prime number p_{i+1} must be standing after 100! + 100. We have p_i < 100! + 2 < \dots < 100! + 100 < p_{i+1}.

It means that we have found two consecutive prime numbers p_i and p_{i+1} such that p_{i+1} - p_i \geq 100. Of course, in the above arguments, we can use any number, instead of using the number 100 we may just use the number 1 million and it still works. So p_{i+1} - p_i can be as large as any number we want.




Twin prime numbers



If we write all the prime numbers in a sequence as 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29, \dots
we will see that there are quite a lot of consecutive primes that are also being the two consecutive odd numbers, such as 3 and 5, 5 and 7, 11 and 13, 17 and 19. These pairs of primes are called twin primes. To this day, mathematicians still don't know whether there are infinite or finite number of twin primes.


Open problem.
Is there an infinite number of prime pairs (p_i, p_{i+1}) such that p_{i+1} - p_i = 2.

Let us stop here for now, we will continue our story about prime numbers in the next post.




Homework.


1. For all n > 0, prove that if 2^n + 1 is a prime number then n must be of the form n = 2^m. It means that if 2^n + 1 is a prime then it must be of the form 2^{2^m} + 1.

2. Prove that there exists a polynomial P(x) such that P(1) = 2, P(2) = 3, P(3) = 5, P(4) = 7, P(5) = 11,..., P(100)= the 100th prime number.