Processing math: 0%

Pages

Solve for special cases first!


I would like to share with you a lesson that I have learnt. That is when facing a problem and we do not know what to do, the first thing we can do is to look at special cases of that problem. Investigating special cases can help us gain a greater understanding of the problem. To illustrate the point, let us solve some problems.



We all know that it's shorter to go straight than to go on a zigzag trail. In mathematics, it means that for any three points A, B, and C, the distance between A and C is always less than or equal to the sum of distances between A to B and B to C. We call this inequality "the triangle inequality". Today, we will use this triangle inequality to solve some geometry problems.


Triangle inequality: AC \leq AB + BC


We start with the first problem. It looks obvious from the figure below that it is shorter to go from A \rightarrow C \rightarrow B than to go from A \rightarrow D \rightarrow B because from AB the point D looks further than the point C. The challenge is how to prove this obvious-looking fact.


it looks obvious that AC + CB \leq AD + DB

Problem 1. Given a triangle ABD and a point C on the triangle. Prove that AC +CB \leq AD + DB.

In mathematics, when we want to solve a problem and we don't know where to start, it is always helpful  to look at some special cases first. By looking at special cases, we may understand the problem better. Sometimes, the technique that we use to solve the problem in special cases may help us to solve the problem in its general form. 

In our problem, we try to put C at different places and see if we can prove the inequality. First, let's say C is on an edge of the triangle. Assume that C is on the edge AD, can we prove AC +CB \leq AD + DB
Well, if  C is on the edge AD, then the inequality AC +CB \leq AD + DB becomes CB \leq CD + DB. Yes, this is the triangle inequality. So this case is solved. We quickly realize that if C is on the edge DB then we can prove it as well. 



Going back to the problem when C is a point on the triangle ADB, can we make C on an edge of a triangle? Yes we can! By drawing the line BC and make it intersect AD at E, we can make the point C lying on the edge of the triangle AEB. So we have AC+CB \leq AE+EB. But again, because E is on AD, we have AE+EB \leq AD +DB. So we have solved the problem!





Solution to problem 1. Let BC intersect with AD at E. We have
AC + CB \leq AE + EC + CB = AE + EB
We also have
AE+EB \leq AE + ED + DB = AD + DB
Combining the two inequalities, we have AC + CB \leq AD + DB. \blacksquare



Let us look at the next problem.






Problem 2. Given a triangle ABC and a point M on AC. Prove that there exists a number 0 \leq \alpha \leq 1 such that BM \leq \alpha BA + (1- \alpha) BC.




Again, let's try to prove the problem in some special cases. If M=A then we need to choose \alpha such that BA \leq \alpha BA + (1- \alpha) BC. We can see that \alpha=1 will satisfy.

What about M=C? If M=C then we need to choose \alpha such that BC \leq \alpha BA + (1- \alpha) BC. In this case \alpha = 0 will satisfy. 

Let us now try M to be the midpoint of AC. Will \alpha = \frac{1}{2} satisfy? In other words, is it true that BM \leq \frac{1}{2} BA + \frac{1}{2} BC when M is the midpoint of AC? Can we make a triangle where one side is BM, another side is \frac{1}{2} BA and the other side is \frac{1}{2} BC?




From the mid point M of AC, if we draw a line parallel to AB, it will cut BC at the mid point N. We have MN = \frac{1}{2} AB and BN = \frac{1}{2} BCSo BM \leq MN + BN =  \frac{1}{2} AB +  \frac{1}{2} BC. We have now solved for the case M is the mid point of AC.







Let us now consider the general case where M is any point on AC. What happen if we construct a similar triangle BMN as above? Well, if from M, we draw a line parallel to AB and it cuts BC at N then what are the values of MN and BN?
We have MN/AB= CM/CA so MN = \frac{CM}{CA} AB. We have BN/BC = AM/AC so BN = \frac{AM}{AC} BC. But \frac{CM}{CA} + \frac{AM}{AC} = 1, so if we choose \alpha = \frac{CM}{CA} then 1-\alpha =  \frac{AM}{AC} and we have BM \leq MN + BN = \alpha AB +  (1-\alpha) BC. We have solved the problem!






Solution to problem 2. From M, draw a line parallel to AB and it cuts BC at N

We have MN/AB= CM/CA so MN = \frac{CM}{CA} AB

Similarly, BN/BC = AM/AC so BN = \frac{AM}{AC} BC

So BM \leq MN + BN =  \frac{CM}{CA} AB + \frac{AM}{AC} BC

If we choose \alpha =  \frac{CM}{CA} then 0 \leq \alpha \leq 1 and BM \leq \alpha BA + (1- \alpha) BC .\blacksquare


That's all for now. We will look at more problems in the next post. Today we learn a lesson that when we solve a problem, it is helpful to look at special cases first. Sometimes, solving for special cases will help us to understand the problem better and may give us hint on how to tackle the problem in its general form.





Homework.

Given two triangles ABC and DBC. Take a point X on AD. Prove that

  • The area of the triangle XBC is less than or equal to the area of the triangle ABC or the area of the triangle DBC;
  • The perimeter of the triangle XBC is less than or equal to the perimeter of the triangle ABC or the perimeter of the triangle DBC.