data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a177c/a177c2aa8edb818977fb39ef333203a75091919e" alt=""
To feed your curiosity, today we will look at a compass and straightedge construction of the regular polygon with 15 sides and we will show that there is a connection between this construction problem with the measuring liquid puzzle that we have learned from our previous post.
Measuring liquid puzzle
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c1cdf/c1cdf4298b306596d6be4e8009f631660b189853" alt=""
First, let us review the following brain teaser puzzle from our previous post.
Measuring liquid puzzle. Suppose you have a 3-liter jug and a 5-liter jug, how would you measure out exactly 1 liter of water?
At first glance, it seems that there are a lot of possibilities with the filling and pouring of water using the two jugs. But if we take a step back and have a careful look, we can categorize all the measuring operations into exactly 8 types:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4eb2c/4eb2c676eb28e071f085e066d743f3b05236bd3c" alt=""
We can see that the amount of water contained in the jugs will initially start with the value $(0,0)$, and after each step of measuring operation, this value $(a,b)$ will change into one of the following 8 possible values $$(0,b), ~~(a,0), ~~(3,b), ~~(a,5),$$ $$(0,a+b), ~~(a+b,0), ~~(a+b-5,5), ~~(3,a+b-3).$$
Therefore, we can easily prove the following fact
The amount of water (in liter) in each of the jug is always a number of the form $3 x + 5 y$ where $x$ and $y$ are two integers.
It means that if we want to measure out 1 liter of water then we have to write the value 1 in the form $3x+5y$. So our puzzle is reduced to the problem of solving the following linear Diophantine equation $$3x + 5y = 1.$$
This equation has infinitely many integer solutions. We can easily see that one solution is $(x=2,y=-1)$ and another one is $(x=-3,y=2)$. These two solutions give us the following two representations of the value 1: $${\bf 3} \times 2 - {\bf 5} \times 1 = 1$$ $${\bf 5} \times 2 - {\bf 3} \times 3 = 1.$$
Corresponding to these two representations, we have the following answers to our puzzle:
![]() |
First solution ${\bf 3} \times 2 - {\bf 5} \times 1=1$: Filling 3-liter jug to the full twice and pouring out to 5-liter jug making it full once, we get 1 liter remaining. |
![]() |
Second solution ${\bf 5} \times 2 - {\bf 3} \times 3=1$: Filling 5-liter jug to the full twice and pouring out to 3-liter jug making it full three times, we get 1 liter remaining. |
We have seen that our measuring liquid puzzle has a close connection with the Diophantine equation $$3x+5y=1.$$ Soon, we will see that this same Diophantine equation enables us to construct a regular polygon with 15 sides.
Regular polygon construction problem
Let us call a polygon with $n$ sides an $n$-gon. A polygon with equal sides and equal angles is called a regular polygon.
The problem of constructing regular polygons by compass and straightedge is one of a few classic problems of ancient mathematics that are easy to state but incredibly difficult to solve. For a long time, we know how to construct an equilateral triangle ($3$-gon) and a regular pentagon ($5$-gon). In his famous books, the Elements, Euclid of ancient Greek presented a method of constructing a regular pentagon. But for the next two thousand years, no one had ever succeeded in constructing a regular $7$-gon, a regular $9$-gon, a regular $11$-gon or a regular $13$-gon. It was not until in 1796, Gauss, only at age 19, made the first breakthrough by successfully constructing a regular $17$-gon. The problem was completely solved in 1837 with the following beautiful theorem
Gauss-Wantzel's Theorem. For an odd number $n$, a regular polygon of $n$ sides can be constructed by compass and straightedge if and only if $n = p_1 \times \dots \times p_t$, where $p_1$, ..., $p_t$ are distinct Fermat's primes.
Fermat's prime. A prime number is called a Fermat's prime if it has the form $$F_k = 2^{2^k}+1.$$According to this definition:
- $k=0$, $F_0 = 2^{2^0}+1 = 2^1 + 1 = 3$ is a prime, so it is a Fermat's prime,
- $k=1$, $F_1 = 2^{2^1}+1 = 2^2 + 1 = 5$ is a prime, so it is a Fermat's prime,
- $k=2$, $F_2 = 2^{2^2}+1 = 2^4 + 1 = 17$ is a prime, so it is a Fermat's prime,
- $k=3$, $F_3 = 2^{2^3}+1 = 2^8 + 1 = 257$ is a prime, so it is a Fermat's prime,
- $k=4$, $F_4 = 2^{2^4}+1 = 2^{16} + 1 = 65537$ is a prime, so it is a Fermat's prime,
- $k=5$, $F_5 = 2^{2^5}+1 = 2^{32} + 1 = 4294967297 = 641 \times 6700417$ is a composite number.
Since $3$ and $5$ are Fermat's primes, by Gauss-Wantzel's Theorem, regular $3$-gons and regular $5$-gons are constructible. In addition, since $15=3 \times 5$, regular $15$-gons are constructible. However, there is a condition in the theorem saying that the Fermat's primes have to be distinct, so $9$-gon and $25$-gon are not constructible by compass and straightedge.
Construction of a regular 15-gon
As we have seen above, $15$ is a product of two distinct Fermat's primes (3 and 5), so by Gauss-Wantzel's Theorem, a regular $15$-gon can be constructed by compass and straightedge. But how can we construct it?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e5ef4/e5ef4956592f880181ec381adfa3a5798e41f225" alt=""
Let us look at a picture of a regular $15$-gon. We can see that its vertices form a lot of equilateral triangles and a lot of regular pentagons.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/da940/da940e0197a44760adf2fe888ffc7d6463e86f5e" alt=""
This observation motivates us to construct first an equilateral triangle and a regular pentagon. Let us draw a circle, and pick a point $P_0$ on it. We can construct an equilateral triangle $A_0 A_1 A_2$ and a regular pentagon $B_0 B_1 B_2 B_3 B_4$ with $A_0 = B_0=P_0$. Now, even though we have not constructed a regular $15$-gon fully, but at least we have a part of it!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2e633/2e633cb294db2320392e5bac8c2e8830463973ef" alt=""
Can we construct other vertices of the $15$-gon? YES WE CAN!!!
Looking at the above picture, we can see that we can actually construct the whole polygon because we have already had the two sides $A_1 B_2$ and $B_3 A_2$. Using compass with radius $A_1 B_2$ (or $B_3 A_2$), from $P_0$ we can construct $P_1$, from $P_1$ we can construct $P_2$, ..., and the rest of it!
Let us now write down the steps of the construction.
- Construct a circle and pick a point $P_0$ on it.
- Construct an equilateral triangle $P_0 P_5 P_{10}$ and a regular pentagon $P_0 P_3 P_6 P_9 P_{12}$.
- Connect the sides $P_5 P_6$ and $P_9 P_{10}$.
- Draw a circle with center $P_0$ and radius equal to $P_5 P_6$, this circle intersects with the original big circle at $P_1$ and $P_{14}$.
- Draw a circle with center $P_3$ and radius equal to $P_5 P_6$, this circle intersects with the original big circle at $P_2$ and $P_{4}$.
- Other vertices $P_7$, $P_8$, $P_{11}$, $P_{13}$ can be constructed similarly.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cc199/cc199bb2677d57da974ee934c1bee3411036a78a" alt=""
Now we know how to construct a regular $15$-gon. Let us take a step back and see why this construction is possible. The crucial part of the construction is the fact that $A_1$ and $B_2$ are next to each other, and also $B_3$ and $A_2$. This fact can be explained by the Diophantine equation $3x+5y=1$.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a9ea9/a9ea910057ad4e55a928d170e99ae67a37981e7a" alt=""
Indeed, if we consider the whole circle as 15 units then each side of the equilateral triangle contains 5 units and each side of the regular pentagon contains 3 units. If we use the point $P_0$ as the origin and measure the distance along the circle, then the point $A_1$ is at 5 unit, the point $A_2$ is at 10 unit. For the regular pentagon, the point $B_1$ is at 3 unit, $B_2$ 6 unit, $B_3$ 9 unit, and $B_4$ 12 unit.
In general, the point $A_i$ is at $5i$ unit and the point $B_j$ is at $3j$ unit. The distance between $A_i$ and $B_j$ along the circle is $$A_i B_j = |5i - 3j|.$$
![]() |
$A_i$ is at $5i$ unit, $B_j$ is at $3j$ unit, so the distance between $A_i$ and $B_j$ is $A_i B_j = |5i - 3j|$ |
According to this distance formula, $A_i$ is next to $B_j$ if and only if the distance between $A_i$ and $B_j$ is 1 unit, that is $$5i-3j = \pm 1$$
One of the solution is $i=2$, $j=3$, this gives us $${\bf 5} \times 2 - {\bf 3} \times 3 = 1$$
this explains why $A_2$ and $B_3$ are next to each other and $B_3 A_2$ forms a side of the 15-gon.
Another solution is $i=1$, $j=2$, $${\bf 5} \times 1 - {\bf 3} \times 2 = -1$$ and this explains why $A_1$ is next to $B_2$.
So the two sides $B_3 A_2$ and $A_1 B_2$ of the regular 15-gon correspond to the two integer solutions of the Diophantine equation $3x+5y=1$. How amazing is that!
From here, we can easily have the following generalization
Draw a circle a pick a point $P_0$. Draw a regular $p$-gon $A_0 A_1 \dots A_{p-1}$ and a regular $q$-gon $B_0 B_1 \dots B_{q-1}$ with $A_0 = B_0 = P_0$. If $p$ and $q$ are two relatively prime numbers then there must exist $A_x$ and $B_y$ such that $A_x B_y$ form a side of a regular $pq$-gon. It means that if a regular $p$-gon and a regular $q$-gon are constructible then a regular $pq$-gon is also constructible.
Let us stop here for now. In our future posts, we will look at Gauss' method of constructing regular $17$-gon. Hope to see you again then.
Homework.
1. Prove the generalization mentioned at the end of the post:
Let $\gcd(p,q)=1$. If a regular $p$-gon and a regular $q$-gon are constructible by compass and straightedge then a regular $pq$-gon is also constructible.