Another Proof of Wilson's Theorem

In previous posts, we have learned about modulo for rational numbers. To show its application, today, we will use the language of modulo of rationals to give another proof of Wilson's Theorem.

Wilson's theorem is a well known theorem in number theory. It is stated as follows.

Wilson's Theorem. If $p$ is a prime number then $$(p-1)! = -1 \pmod{p}.$$

Modulo for rational numbers II

In the previous post, we have learned about modulo for rational numbers. Today, we will continue on this topic and will learn about some properties of this modulo.

First of all, let us look at some examples and review the definition: $$\frac{14}{5} =_{Q} ~0 \pmod{7}, $$ $$ \frac{16}{55} =_{Q} ~\frac{9}{55} =_{Q} ~\frac{2}{55} \pmod{7},$$ $$\frac{1}{4} =_{Q} ~\frac{8}{4} =_{Q} ~2 \pmod{7}, \dots$$

Definition. Let $n$ be an integer, and $\alpha$, $\beta$ two rational numbers. We say that $\alpha$ is equal to $\beta$ modulo $n$, and write $$\alpha =_{Q} ~\beta \pmod{n}$$ if and only if there exists an integer $k$ co-prime to $n$ such that $k(\alpha - \beta)$ is an integer and $$k(\alpha - \beta) = 0 \pmod{n}.$$

Modulo for rational numbers

In our series on modulo, we have learned about modulo for integer numbers. Let us recall the definition.

Definition. Let $n$, $a$, $b$ be integer numbers. We say that $a$ is equal to $b$ modulo $n$, and write $$a = b \pmod{n}$$ if and only if $a-b$ is a multiple of $n$.

For example, $$8 = 0 \pmod{4},$$ $$9 = 1 \pmod{4},$$ $$-5 = -1 = 3 = 7 \pmod{4}, \dots $$

Today, we will learn a new concept - modulo for rational numbers. Before going into the details, let us list here a few examples, so that we may roughly see what modulo for rationals is about.

Examples of modulo for rational numbers: $$\frac{8}{5} =_{Q} ~0 \pmod{4}, $$ $$ -\frac{12}{55} =_{Q} ~0 \pmod{4},$$ $$\frac{29}{15} =_{Q} ~\frac{25}{15} = \frac{5}{3} \pmod{4}$$

A proof of Wilson's Theorem using polynomial interpolation

In the last posts, we have learned about polynomial interpolation through two formulas, the Newton's interpolation formula and the Lagrange's interpolation formula. Both formulas can be used to prove the Wilson's theorem.

In this post, we will present a proof of the Wilson's theorem based on the Newton's interpolation formula. The other proof, that is, proving Wilson's theorem based on the Lagrange's interpolation formula, we leave it as a homework exercise.

Wilson's Theorem is a well known theorem in number theory. It says that if $p$ is prime number then the number $(p−1)!+1$ is a multiple of $p$.

Lagrange polynomial interpolation

Today we will continue to learn about polynomial interpolation. In the last post, we have learned about Newton's interpolation formula, today we will learn a different interpolation formula called the Lagrange interpolation formula.


We will use the following example $$P(x) = 2x^2 - 3x + 3$$

This polynomial $P(x)$ is a polynomial of degree $2$ and we can calculate that $$P(1) = 2, ~~P(2) = 5, ~~P(3) = 12.$$

The polynomial interpolation problem is the problem of reconstructing the polynomial $P(x)$, given the condition that $P(1) = 2$, $P(2) = 5$, and $P(3) = 12$.

Newton polynomial interpolation

Today, we will learn about polynomial interpolation.

Suppose we have the following polynomial $$P(x) = 2x^2 - 3x + 3$$

Let us calculate the values of the polynomial $P(x)$ for a few values of $x$ as follows $$P(1) = 2 - 3 + 3 = 2,$$ $$P(2) = 8 - 6 + 3 = 5,$$ $$P(3) = 18 - 9 + 3 = 12, \dots$$

Now, suppose that we are given the following information $$P(1) = 2, ~~P(2) = 5, ~~P(3) = 12,$$ can we reconstruct the polynomial $P(x)$?

The answer is, yes, we can. An interpolation formula enables us to reconstruct the polynomial $P(x)$ based on its values. Today, we will learn about Newton's interpolation formula, and in the next post, we will cover Lagrange's interpolation.

1 = 2012 = 2013

In previous posts, we learned about mathematical induction and we used induction to solve some problems. We can see that mathematical induction is a useful technique in problem solving. Today, we will consider two induction proofs that lead to a wrong result that $$1 = 2012 = 2013$$ Let us know if you can identify the wrong steps in the proofs.

Binomial identity

As we are learning about mathematical induction, in this post, we are going to use induction to prove the following:

• formula for the Pascal's triangle $$p_{n,k} = {n \choose k} = \frac{n!}{k! (n-k)!}$$
• the binomial identity $$(x+y)^n = x^n + {n \choose 1} x^{n-1} y + {n \choose 2} x^{n-2} y^2 + \dots + {n \choose {n-2}} x^{2} y^{n-2} + {n \choose {n-1}} x y^{n-1} + y^n$$

Mathematical induction III

Today, we will solve some more problems using mathematical induction.

Problem 7. Observe that $$\cos 2 \alpha = 2 \cos^2 \alpha - 1$$

Prove that we can write $\cos n\alpha$ as a polynomial of $\cos \alpha$.

Mathematical induction II

Today we will use induction to solve some more problems. 

Problem 4. Prove that $$1 \times 2 \times 3 + 2 \times 3 \times 4 + \dots + n (n+1)(n+2) = \frac{1}{4} n(n+1)(n+2)(n+3).$$

Mathematical induction

Today, we will learn about mathematical induction. We usually use induction to prove a certain statement to be correct for all natural numbers.

Let us use $P(n)$ to denote a statement that involves a natural number $n$. To prove that $P(n)$ is correct for all natural number $n$, an induction proof will have the following steps

Step 1: is called the initial step. We will prove that the statement $P(n)$ is correct for the case $n=0$.

Step 2: is called the induction step. This is the most important step. In this step,

• we assume that for any $0 \leq n \leq k$, the statement $P(n)$ is correct;
• with this assumption, we will prove that the statement $P(n)$ is also correct for the case $n=k+1$.

With these two steps, by the mathematical induction principle, we conclude that the statement $P(n)$ must be correct for all natural number $n$.

Pascal's triangle

Today, we will look at a famous number pattern, the Pascal's number triangle.

Pascal's triangle